entries friends calendar user info DeCandido.net back back forward forward
KRAD's Inaccurate Guide to Life - SFWA screws the pooch
ramblings from a mad fedora'd writer
kradical
[info]kradical
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
SFWA screws the pooch
Edited to add: SFWA has investigated the matter and decided to keep "WEaT" on the ballot. I responded to that. Please read this linked post after reading the post below and before you reply in either thread. *grin* Thanks...

Original post:

The final Nebula ballot has been released.

For Best Script, one of the nominees is "World Enough and Time," one of the Star Trek: New Voyages fan films.

Yes, a fan film is on the Nebula ballot. The same Nebula ballot which would never sully its hallowed halls by allowing a media tie-in novel or short story, has a fan film on it.

Look, this isn't a knock on the fan films as such. But that's what they are -- they're fan films. They are not professionally produced. What's more, they're unauthorized and, by the letter of the law, illegal. In fact, one of the reasons why they're not prosecuted, is because they don't turn a profit, which is one of the legion of ways that they're not professionally produced.

Remember a couple years back, a woman named Lori Jareo published one of her Star Wars fanfics? Imagine if that got a Nebula nomination. Think it's crazy? Maybe -- but Another Hope is the exact same thing as "World Enough and Time."

In 2002, John Ordover -- then a Star Trek fiction editor for Pocket Books -- started a campaign to get Nebula consideration for "Isolation Ward 4" by Kevin G. Summers, an excellent story in Star Trek: Strange New Worlds IV. The story actually made the preliminary ballot, but not the final ballot. That's as close as any professionally published, fully authorized tie-in fiction has ever gotten to a Nebula Award.

Yet, a similar campaign -- and it was a campaign, because I got e-mail from one of the campaigners trying to get me to recommend this -- for "WEaT" has apparently been more successful.

Mind you, it probably won't matter. For one thing, the Best Script Nebula is quite possibly the most useless award in the history of award-giving. For another, the Steven Moffat-penned Doctor Who episode "Blink" is also on the ballot, and I'd say it's definitely the frontrunner.

But it shouldn't be on the ballot in the first place. And my opinion, as a dues-paying member of the organization, is that it should be removed forthwith as not qualifying for the award. This should also be the opinion of everyone. Why?

From the Nebula rules, regarding the category of Best Script:

Script: a professionally produced audio, radio, television, motion picture, multimedia, or theatrical script

Star Trek: New Voyages is not professionally produced. Period.

I swear, if anybody trots out the, "Well, yeah, it's a fan film, but it's soooooo well-written and -produced that it may as well be professionally produced" argument (which was used on me when the aforesaid campaigner tried to get me to recommend "WEaT"), I will personally go to their house and show them what I can do with my brown belt. Seriously. I've written fanfiction. I'd like to think it's written at the same level as my professional work -- but you know what? It's still fanfiction. I wouldn't expect it to get Nebula consideration, and the very same people who happily went with putting "WEaT" on the ballot would be disgusted at the very notion of fanfic being on the prose portions of the ballot.

But it's the exact same thing.

I therefore urge the SFWA Awards Rules Committee -- Jeffrey A. Carver, James Patrick Kelly, and Connie Willis-- to remove this non-qualifying item from the ballot.

I gotta say, between this and the distinct possibility of President Andrew Burt, I'm seriously reconsidering my SFWA membership....

Current Mood: pissed off
Current Music: "Victor Jara" by Arlo Guthrie

Comments
scifantasy From: [info]scifantasy Date: February 22nd, 2008 05:21 pm (UTC) (Link)
Script (or Dramatic Presentation) Nebulae seem to be a mess no matter how you slice it. I recall that JMS resigned from SFWA over their reason why there was no Dramatic Presentation award around the time Babylon 5 was on the air.

You're exactly right about why "World Enough and Time" shouldn't be on the ballot. You'd think that legal tie-in fiction would get recognized by the SFWA before illegal fanwork.
scifantasy From: [info]scifantasy Date: February 22nd, 2008 05:23 pm (UTC) (Link)
I recall that JMS resigned from SFWA over their reason why there was no Dramatic Presentation award around the time Babylon 5 was on the air.

Er. This looks all wrong--he resigned because of the argument. He talked about it later, around when B5 began winning Hugo awards, but he'd been resigned for a while first.
shsilver From: [info]shsilver Date: February 22nd, 2008 05:26 pm (UTC) (Link)
The jury is only empowered to add an item to the ballot, they can not remove an item from the ballot. The person to bring this to is SFWA Awards Rules Committee, comprised of Jeffrey A. Carver, James Patrick Kelly, and Connie Willis. They can make a ruling to remove an item from the ballot.
kradical From: [info]kradical Date: February 22nd, 2008 05:28 pm (UTC) (Link)
Oh.

Crap.

And I already sent it to the Forum. *wry grin*
hughcasey From: [info]hughcasey Date: February 22nd, 2008 05:34 pm (UTC) (Link)
Gee, that's funny... I just commented about this here:

http://hughcasey.livejournal.com/749848.html

I'd originally linked to Terri's post, but switched to this one when it was pointed out that her's was locked. Hope you don't mind.
kradical From: [info]kradical Date: February 22nd, 2008 05:51 pm (UTC) (Link)
Link all you want. I want this rant to spread as far as possible.....
thatwasjen From: [info]thatwasjen Date: February 22nd, 2008 05:52 pm (UTC) (Link)
I'm not a writer and I'm not a member of SFWA, so I have no authority to rant. But I'm an editor, and a strong believer in copyright law (and a believer also that fanfiction is almost always a violation thereof).

So it seems to me that legitimizing fanwork is a slap in the face of every professional creator and a negation of their ownership of the characters, worlds, and stories they have created. Whereas tie-in media is sanctioned by the copyright creator(s), which makes it legitimate, and contracted for by someone with a checkbook, which makes it professional. Am I seeing this about right?
kradical From: [info]kradical Date: February 22nd, 2008 05:54 pm (UTC) (Link)
Pretty much, yeah.....
Editor, edit thyself - [info]thatwasjen Expand
wouldyoueva From: wouldyoueva Date: February 22nd, 2008 05:53 pm (UTC) (Link)
I gotta say, between this and the distinct possibility of President Andrew Burt, I'm seriously reconsidering my SFWA membership....

You know, you could always run for SFWA President. I don't know whether Estate members can vote, but if I can, you'd have my vote.
kradical From: [info]kradical Date: February 22nd, 2008 05:55 pm (UTC) (Link)
I've considered running for SFWA President in the past, on the platform that, if elected, I will abolish the offices of President and Vice-President, and just let the executive director run things. I have not done so for a variety of reasons, not least being the very real fear that such a platform would be sufficiently attractive that I'd win....
Corporate Governance - [info]kevin_standlee Expand
Re: Corporate Governance - [info]kradical Expand
nelilly From: [info]nelilly Date: February 22nd, 2008 06:21 pm (UTC) (Link)
Michael Reaves is a professional screen-writer... did he somehow lose his pro status by writing this screen-play?
(no subject) - [info]scifantasy Expand
(no subject) - [info]meiran Expand
(no subject) - [info]nelilly Expand
(no subject) - [info]meiran Expand
(no subject) - [info]nelilly Expand
(no subject) - [info]delkytlar Expand
(no subject) - [info]nelilly Expand
(no subject) - [info]kradical Expand
(no subject) - [info]kradical Expand
(no subject) - [info]nelilly Expand